9 Comments
User's avatar
TheNoThankYou's avatar

Won’t this just cause China to further increase the speed of electrification of its economy?

Bullionbite's avatar

Eventually yes, but electrification doesn’t replace diesel fast enough.

Penni Livingston's avatar

This is a level of understanding I just don’t get elsewhere and I read a lot. I really appreciate you and your coverage.

Bullionbite's avatar

Thank you, Penni. Appreciate you sharing your thoughts.

Karola Spring's avatar

Thank you for explaining this situation. The U.S. now has control of Venezuelan oil and China has a monopoly on silver, gallium and other vital metals, do you see a way forward for negotiating. Each has what the other wants after all.

I’m new to all of this and am learning with each of your posts. Thank you.

Bullionbite's avatar

Thanks, much appreciated. Might be some room to talk, but a clean swap seems unlikely. If anything moves, it’ll probably be quiet.

Doug's avatar

TMX has the capacity to increase supply, China has the money, so that would seem to be the play I would think?

Bullionbite's avatar

Just having TMX capacity and Chinese money doesn’t solve it. U.S. Gulf refiners will be bidding for the same heavy barrels, so the discount likely shrinks. TMX helps with access, not with keeping it cheap.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 5
Comment removed
Bullionbite's avatar

Well said. Once those cokers are built for heavy sour, switching feed isn’t just pricey, it stops making sense.

and that Ferrari line is perfect.