Make the Arctic Great Again
Trump tariffs Europe for Greenland. The island isn't for sale. The alliance might be.
Seventy-five years of transatlantic alliance. The most formidable military bloc in human history.
All of it now hostage to what Trump has called a large real estate deal.
On January 17, Trump announced tariffs on eight European nations. Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, Finland. 10% now, 25% by June, unless Denmark agrees to sell Greenland.
Small problem.
Denmark can’t sell Greenland. The 2009 Self-Government Act recognized Greenlanders as a distinct people with the right to self-determination. Any change requires a referendum. As one Danish parliamentarian put it, the whole idea is so absurd and surreal.
Rubio reportedly has a $700 billion offer ready. No one’s picking up.
The official justification is the Golden Dome missile defense system, which supposedly requires sovereignty over Greenlandic territory for technical efficacy. Trump himself said the system depends on angles, metes, and bounds that only work if Greenland is included.
The 1951 agreement already lets the U.S. build whatever it wants at Pituffik Space Base. The administration wants sovereignty because access involves asking permission.
Sovereignty eliminates the veto.
The rare earth angle is real. Greenland sits on massive deposits. China controls most of global production and nearly all of NATO’s processing capacity. The strategic dependency exists.
The solution, apparently, is to fracture the alliance responsible for containing China’s actual military expansion.
Brilliant.
France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, the UK, and Denmark issued a joint statement: Greenland belongs to its people.Denmark is spending billions on Arctic patrol vessels and a new command headquarters in Nuuk. European troops are deploying for something called Operation Arctic Endurance.
The EU Defense Commissioner warned that a U.S. invasion would be the end of NATO.
European defense ministers now openly discussing Article 5 invocations against the United States.
Let that sink in.
The legal foundation for all of this rests on IEEPA, a 1977 law designed for financial sanctions during emergencies. The Supreme Court is currently deciding whether it authorizes tariffs at all. Lower courts said no. During oral arguments, both conservative and liberal justices asked skeptical questions.
Trump posted that a negative ruling would mean WE’RE SCREWED.
He’s not wrong about that part.
75% of Americans oppose this. Including half of Republicans. In Greenland itself, 85% reject becoming American.
Mitch McConnell called the threats unseemly and counterproductive. He warned that seizing allied territory would be an especially catastrophic act of strategic self-harm. Bipartisan legislation is moving to block funding for anything that would fracture NATO.
Meanwhile, the trade deal that took eighteen months to negotiate? The one where the EU committed to massive U.S. energy purchases and investments?
Gone.
The European Parliament’s largest bloc declared approval not possible at this stage.
The EU has retaliatory measures ready. Germany and France are pushing to activate something called the Anti-Coercion Instrument. A trade bazooka designed specifically for economic blackmail.
This exposes the fragility of relying on unilateral deals rather than binding treaties.
No kidding.
If IEEPA collapses in court, the backup plan is Section 232, which allows tariffs when imports threaten national security. Applying that to all goods from eight countries would require arguing that French wine imperils American defense.
Good luck with that.
China and Russia must be having a field day.
Trump is a fucking idiot. He knows nothing about world affairs. In Moscow and Beijing, they're all saying "and....?"