The possibility of a revival for the embattled FTX cryptocurrency exchange has ignited a fierce discussion on Twitter, with users expressing contrasting views on the matter. While proponents are rallying behind the idea of a revamped FTX 2.0, opponents remain skeptical, emphasizing the exchange's previous failure.
The speculation surrounding the potential resurrection of FTX, which experienced a dramatic collapse and subsequent bankruptcy proceedings, has triggered a flurry of rumors, conjecture, and passionate debates. A notable figure in the crypto community, Flood, took to Twitter to express his readiness to engage in public discourse on the topic of "FTX 2.0." With a substantial claim in the range of millions of dollars, Flood voiced his current skepticism, citing the lack of information available thus far.
The tweet by Flood has set off a chain reaction, drawing responses from individuals who question the feasibility of FTX 2.0. One person asked, "How exactly are you going to have FTX 2.0 when the token supporting its automated market maker (AMM) is down 95%?" Another Twitter user criticized the idea, stating, "FTX 2.0 won't work. It's a terrible idea from new leadership trying to save their jobs. Sorry, but you've already lost a significant amount of money." Ethical concerns were also raised by an individual who asked, "Don't 2.0 proponents think it's unethical to lure people back into 'the casino'?"
These questions have resonated with many, with one Twitter account named Whale Chart posing the query, "Will you trust FTX 2.0?" The response was resolute, as one user declared, "I will never support FTX 2.0. It's probably controlled by the U.S. government." The debate intensified as a poll was initiated, attracting 547 active participants on Twitter as of June 18, 2023, 8 a.m. Eastern Time.
The poll aimed to gather valuable insights into the sentiments of FTX creditors and potential users. It asked, "If you are a creditor, are you for or against an FTX reboot? If you are not a creditor, would you use FTX 2.0 and deposit new funds, given equivalent incentives?" By 8 a.m., the results of the poll provided a clear picture of creditor sentiments. Surprisingly, 49.3% expressed support for the proposed FTX 2.0, while 11.7% remained opposed. Interestingly, 8.6% of respondents, who were not creditors themselves, indicated their enthusiasm for utilizing FTX 2.0.
However, a significant 30.5% declared that they were neither creditors nor inclined to embrace the rebooted version. Scott Melker, also known as the Wolf of All Streets, voiced his strong opposition, tweeting, "FTX 2.0 is a terrible idea. No matter how it is presented, the association of FTX with fraud will terrify and alienate the mainstream. Kill the idea." Other notable figures, including Wayne Vaughan and Bruce Fenton, also expressed their skepticism, suggesting that FTX is not worth reviving.
Nevertheless, amidst the fervent debate, a multitude of individuals remain ardent supporters of an FTX reboot. Some enthusiasts have even added "FTX 2.0" to their Twitter names as a visible symbol of their unwavering backing. A Twitter account called the "FTX 2.0 Coalition" has emerged, wholeheartedly championing the cause of resurrecting the defunct exchange.
The account confidently shared screenshots of sentiment polls demonstrating widespread approval and declared on June 3, "The FTX brand has unexpected staying power." Alongside the growing buzz, rumors have surfaced suggesting that FTX 2.0 will operate as an offshore exchange, positioned beyond the reach of the United States.
As speculations continue to swirl and opinions clash on Twitter, the fate of FTX remains uncertain. The division between supporters and skeptics highlights the need for thorough consideration and transparency in any potential revival of the cryptocurrency exchange. Only time will tell whether FTX 2.0 can overcome its past challenges and regain the trust of its users.
